You’ve already mulliganed to a hand of:
You scry, and your top card is a Swamp.
Do you keep it on top or put it to the bottom? What is your plan for turns 1-3, not knowing what the opponent might play?
There are a few options here, so let’s break them down.
1) Scry Swamp to the bottom.
This seems excessively greedy. Don’t do this.
2) Scry Swamp to the top.
- Discard Minotaur on turn 2 to Mummy, with the plan of using Cartouche to find your fourth land for Curator. This gives you a high-upside 4/4, but you get less power into play by playing Cartouche on turn 3 instead of Minotaur. This is also disastrous if you miss on lands and don’t draw other plays.
- Don’t play Mummy to avoid discarding a good card, and because it’s blanked by a 3/3. This seems too conservative. Sometimes your opponent just won’t have an early play, or even a 3/3, and the Mummy can get a bunch of attacks in. It’s also just spewing off 2 mana in a game where mana is hugely constrained. I wouldn’t advise this.
- Cycle Curator because you are going to discard it to Mummy anyways, and this at least gives you a different option to discard. This means you don’t need to hit your fourth land to have plays, and lets you go 2-drop into 3-drop into Cartouche.
Keep Swamp on top. Play Island and cycle Curator, with the intention of playing Mummy on turn 2 (and discarding whatever I draw unless it’s better than Minotaur/Cartouche, which is unlikely). I then plan on playing Minotaur turn 3, and Cartouche on either Mummy or Minotaur turn 4, depending on what creatures my opponent has played.
What would you do, and why?
Have a sweet scenario of your own? If you think you can stump the readers (and me) then send it to [email protected]*, or via Twitter—just send a screenshot @LSV and I’ll be happy to take a look!
*Please keep your answers in the comments below, and not in my email inbox—I love reading through these responses, but I wouldn’t want to lose any good submissions amid the answers. Thanks!