
The Dope Show - Why You Aren’t Winning
Truth be told, I didn’t foresee myself returning to the celebrated ranks of the internet Magic community. Then again, I didn’t foresee myself sloughing the pitiful remnants of my ambition and being down to my last 284 dollars either, so I suppose I should stop making assumptions about my future. Financial difficulties aside, I simply couldn’t resist the allure of the glamour and adulation heaped on those who write articles. I have an overwhelming desire to be back in the limelight, and heck, it’s been years since I’ve signed a Pro Player card.
For those familiar with my work, I shouldn’t have to point out that I was being a little sarcastic just now. I don’t plan on over-explaining jokes (or explaining myself at all!) from here on in, but I felt the need to clarify once, as it has been a while since you’ve been exposed to my particular brand of “acerbic wit.”
For those unfamiliar with my work…hi! I am Timothy James Aten of Vermilion, Ohio. I have, at times, been perceived as arrogant, but this ostensible audacity is tempered by spells of depression-induced abject humility. I don’t mince words, and I flaunt my candor. Also, I’m often unfairly pegged as being perpetually negative and a bit of a misanthrope. In actuality, I hold myself and the human race to high standards and am disappointed when we don’t measure up. I give credit where due, but quite frankly, it ain’t due nearly as much as most dole it out.
As for my Magical resume, I won Ohio Valley Regionals in 2001, which qualified me for Pro Tour New Orleans on rating in addition to earning me a Nationals invite. When my success tapered off, I turned to internet writing to bolster my notoriety. (This time, unfortunately, I’m not being sarcastic.) Eventually, I found my rhythm and got good at Magic for-realzies, securing a berth on the train and racking up a few solid finishes, including 17th at PT San Diego ‘04 and 15th at PT London ’05 (Who got 14th at that one? - LSV). Before long, though, the concept of being on the Pro Tour lost its luster, and I had grown quite weary of international travel; thus, I skipped a bunch of PTs and, as a result, “fell off” the train. Because I had lost interest in playing on the Tour, and because it was difficult coming up with fresh material, my writing dried up as well.
Now, much like the noble Lightning Bolt, I have returned. (As the faithful can see, my knack for timely references remains unscathed.) I never really stopped playing, and even now I probably shan’t be attending any foreign PTs, but I am back to writing.
Also, if we’re being honest, it’s not really fair to compare myself to the decidedly overpowered premium removal spell. I’m more like Serra Angel–not as impressive as people remembered, but still pretty good in draft.
Or whatever. Let’s not dwell on the various holes in that ill-conceived metaphor and instead move right onto today’s magical topic, which is…
You’re Not as Good at Magic as You Could Be
You need to practice more, you need to play with good people, you need to watch good people play, you need to own up to your mistakes blah blah blah blah blah. I won’t be talking about these things. Sure, they’re true, but they’re also fairly obvious, and you’ve already been told them by dozens of people. I’m going to try my hardest not to rehash played-out topics; as such, I don’t plan on discussing the M10 rules changes, for instance. (I also hate when someone thinks he’s come up with some life-altering revelation and ends up blathering on about a subject that’s already been covered a billion times but with his own brand new pseudo-intellectual nomenclature.)
My suggested areas of improvement are more in the realm of the psychological. As such, I get to tout my degree in psychology to lend credence to my assertions…even though I don’t remember anything I learned in college and never heard anything resembling what I’m going to discuss! Bonus!
The biggest potential problem could be that you don’t actually care about winning that much. It may be your objective, but you have ulterior motives that obscure your path to victory. Specifically, some people seem more interested in glory and/or respect than solid technical play, and this detriment manifests itself in a number of ways.
You may mulligan too frequently, and one possible subconscious reason for this is that it provides you a clean, responsibility-free excuse for losing. If memory serves, Paulo Vitor Dance Dance Revolution mentioned this in his article on mulligans. After a match is over, you know you’ll save face when you lament to your friends, “Yeah I lost…but I mulliganed to 5.” Going to 5 is a pretty solid excuse for an individual loss–not that it matters since everyone “should” ultimately double mull the same amount in the long term–but it’s not a reasonable excuse if you’re mulling incorrectly. Besides, no one cares about your pathetic justifications.
In addition, some people have it fixed in their minds that “good players mulligan,” and they use that as a tiebreaker when pondering over borderline hands. Once you have a comfortable working knowledge of which hands are definite mulls–1-landers, hands low on action, hands poor against the deck you’re battling, hands that won’t do much even if you draw the perfect card two turns in a row, and so on–you should actually err on the side of NOT mulling. After all, seven cards are better than six.
Another respect-seeking behavior is boasting to your friends about how you “punted” your last match. Sure, you’re accepting responsibility for your actions, but you’re too preoccupied with hopes that your Magical superiors will be as enamored of your self-awareness as you are. In the most egregious cases, you may not even know where you made the mistake; you’re just content with the knowledge that it happened somewhere. In still other cases, it’s possible that you’re being results-oriented. (I’ve grown tired of this phrase, but since I’m actually using it correctly, I hope you’ll forgive me.) Sometimes you can make the right play and still lose because your opponent drew card X instead of card Y, the latter of which was somewhat more likely. This does not count as an error.
Finally, keep in mind that not every game is winnable. For example, don’t go crazy trying to convince yourself that you lost because you didn’t mulligan if your opening hand was fine in the abstract, but your opponent did something you couldn’t have possibly anticipated to invalidate it.
Oh, and for the love of God, never ever utter the phrase, “Man I’m awful.” Of course you’re awful! Everyone’s awful on the absolute scale except for Luis, Cheon, Japan, and like five other people. Magic players who make this general statement, much like the people who are excited to tell you how they’ve misplayed, are quite pleased with their recognition of their own shortcomings. In itself, this isn’t helpful to them, and it’s annoying to everyone else. Most of the people who say it are above average in Magic prowess, and they even know this, but they think this pseudo-humility will garner acceptance by the professionals.
While I’m on the topic of stuff no one wants to hear you say, might I suggest a moratorium on “justice,” “still had these,” “sick variance,” “ loose,” and whichever ones I’m forgetting? You could also do well to consult a thesaurus before saying that you “punted” one more freaking time.
…and now we’ve reached the part of the article where I realize I’ve digressed too far and remain apologetic while pretending to have forgotten what I was talking about before aforementioned digression, preferably with liberal use of the word “aforementioned.”
Anyway. (I was using this as my catchall awkward regrouping transition before I’d even HEARD of Chuck Klosterman, so I have no qualms about its continued use.)
I’m not saying you shouldn’t think critically about where you went wrong during a game. I’m just saying that acknowledging errors is merely the first step in self-improvement.
The next potential roadblock is playing in front of an audience. Some people get nervous if a bunch of people are watching, and this is, again, because of excessive concern for other people’s opinions. (You don’t want to look stupid, do you?) Just ignore them. Heck, they may even be watching the match next to you! If you’re drafting in front of other people in a high-level event, don’t second-guess yourself because you’re afraid you’ll be chastised for passing a certain card. There’s nothing anyone in the audience should be able to do to help or hurt you; just calm down, use your instincts and experience, and don’t go on tilt.
Focusing too much on being charming and “playing to the crowd” could bite you as well. Unless you’re confident that you’re not going to distract yourself, play Magic now and deliver clever verbal jabs later.
The following doesn’t fit in perfectly with the topic, but it seems the best place to put it in this article: when you’re playing against a “name” player, don’t go into “just happy to be here” mode. Obviously it’s awkward if you make mistakes because you’re nervous about having to face THE Owen Turtenwald, or if you’re more prone to playing scared because you assume the pro “always has it.” But don’t give up the match psychologically, and don’t value trying to get this Famous Celebrity to like you over getting the W. Playing against a pro can be tantamount to mulliganing; people sometimes try to use it as a guilt-free excuse for losing.
For the record, “just happy to be here” mode most often occurs when someone is playing in his first PTQ/GP Top 8. Don’t start resting on your laurels before there are laurels to rest on.
A corner case of self-handicapping is something I’ve referred to as the writer’s curse. This states that people whose primary purpose is to write articles–either to build up their notoriety or to craft a pretty-sounding theory that is ultimately meaningless–don’t win as many matches as they could because tight play is not their ultimate goal. I don’t mean that writers make wacky misplays on purpose to make for more interesting anecdotes; my assertion is firmly in the realm of the subconscious. Simply put, if winning isn’t your number one priority, you don’t care as much as you could. If you don’t care as much as you could, you won’t win as frequently.
The remaining two impediments I’ll discuss involve improper allocation of mental resources. These are undue focus on minutiae and procedural compulsions.
One largely asinine detail that some people put too much emphasis on is the artwork of opposing basic land. Until you have the more straightforward, more statistically relevant strategic tactics down, don’t worry about whether the Mountain the opponent just played is the one he fetched with Sylvan Bounty. If you notice it incidentally, more power to you, but how often will it be relevant to know 1/5 the contents of your opponent’s hand? He’s probably playing it next turn anyway; the edge is not worth the expenditure. Some people probably love to do this because it makes them feel clever.
You SHOULD keep track of when your opponent fetches a Mountain and plays a Plains, but worrying about different pictures on the same basic land type is taking it too far. If you do have the mental capacity to play sound Magic AND keep track of whether the set number on his Plains was 230 or 232, then by all means, do so.
Writing down the cause of each change in life totals, while recommended by some judges, isn’t practical in the real world. It’s more likely that you’ll miss something in the game–or that you’ll either run out of time in a round or forget what your abbreviations meant–than it is that there will be a life total discrepancy you couldn‘t figure out without notes. Again, if you have every other detail of the game on lockdown, this could be helpful. Strategic soundness and tactical proficiency are the meat; pressing tiny advantages is the garnish. What good is the lemon zest without the tilapia? Who cares about truffle shavings when the venison is chewy?
Hold on a second. Let me turn off Iron Chef.
Okay.
I made a comment in a previous article that when my opponent says “Untap. Upkeep. Draw.” every turn, I like my chances of winning. (Often the last part includes the phrase “a card” and is pronounced “drawl.”) People like this are preoccupied by procedure. If they’re new to the competitive scene and are being cautious, fine, but after a while, they have to leave it behind. You don’t need to say every phase out loud, your lands and graveyard don’t have to be perfectly straight, and you certainly don’t need to tilt your head to the side and look at your opponent inquisitively as you announce every spell. Hm. Maybe that last one is just a pet peeve, but it is strongly correlated with being a mediocre barn-piece.
One detestable behavior that, in my opinion, falls under this umbrella of detrimental compulsions is the card-flick. Some Magic players seem to have an overwhelming NEED to snap the cards in their hands rapidly back and forth, almost like they’re acting on some sort of fetish and the fact that they’re also playing a game is incidental.
—
The scope of this article was probably too ambitious for my grand return, and it probably wasn’t executed as well as it could have been. Hopefully it wasn’t complete gibberish and somehow helped a few of you reflect on some unforeseen weaknesses. I’ll do better next time, Luis! I promise! Don’t fire me! I’m really clutching at straws here. I’m probably one failure away from a spiral into a mental hospital. Do you really want to be the one responsible for that, even if you are incredibly jealous that I have a Pro Player card and you don’t?
Join me next week when I discuss split etiquette, give my first impressions on M10 limited, and use the word “discuss” superfluously because I’m a giant hack.
Timothy James Aten
Easy Target on Modo
expirydates1024@yahoo.com
Post-Signoff Bonus
I’m a compulsive list-maker, so there will probably be a lot of lists here, usually music-related. I wouldn’t be surprised if some Ravitz chat pastes show up some weeks, either.
My Top 5 Favorite Songs to Play on Rock Band Drums
5. The Fratellis “Creepin’ up the Backstairs”
4. Avenged Sevenfold “Afterlife”
3. The Offspring “Come out and Play”
2. Testament “Souls of Black”
1. Rise Against “Give It All”







oh god I namedropped you on SCG in an attempt to get you to write
haven’t even read it yet but 10/10 would read again
Comment by Seeker — July 1, 2009 @ 10:17 pm
Good to see you return to Magic writing. Your articles are entertaining and contain legitimately good material, which is more than can be said of some writers.
Comment by Griffin — July 1, 2009 @ 10:23 pm
Great Article! As a player who makes excuses way too often, I can really see that instead of trying to not let my pride get hurt, I should instead look back and learn why I lost and what I could do better next time. Cant wait to read more!
Comment by David — July 1, 2009 @ 10:23 pm
I’ve never been happier than when I saw this article on the front page. The bad economy’s always finding ways to make my life better!
I’ve hated for a while how popular it is for good Magic players to say they are bad at Magic. It’s so old.
Comment by Brian Six — July 1, 2009 @ 10:47 pm
Awesome stuff. Reinforces a lot of the basics, though the scope can basically be boiled down to the old Magic cliche “Focus only on what matters” (which I would imagine you’re also sick of).
Also, nice to see that someone else enjoys playing Testament’s Souls Of Black. Seems like most of the people I know who play Rock Band don’t even know that song. Though it seems like I’m still the only person I know who actually listens to Testament…
Comment by MBraids — July 1, 2009 @ 10:54 pm
lol this article was witty on several different levels…
Comment by Jim — July 1, 2009 @ 11:23 pm
“might I suggest a moratorium on “justice,” “still had these,” “sick variance,” “ loose,” and whichever ones I’m forgetting?”
So very professional and yet without pause to wipe the shoes on the doormat.
Comment by sneezy — July 2, 2009 @ 12:12 am
Nothing better than the Creepin’ Up the Backstairs/Give it All back to backs with me on vocals and you on drums.
Comment by JoeBags — July 2, 2009 @ 12:13 am
This was a good article.
Comment by Doobs — July 2, 2009 @ 1:35 am
Nice piece Timothy, well-written.
I definitely agree with you regarding thinking critically about your play and making adjustments. When I got into magic, I found that I was forgetting to do a lot of things at end of turn. By just putting a die on top of my library, I fixed that mistake and now I remember to play a spell or effect (like sacrificing a panorama) at end of turn.
One mistake I made recently in a limited event was playing too cautiously knowing that my opponent had a bomb. I was keeping counter-magic mana open for something that was probably buried on the bottom of his library instead of playing more creatures to beat him down with. It probably cost me the match.
Anyways, keep up the great work.
Comment by Mintz — July 2, 2009 @ 2:25 am
great article
very nice to read, intersting and entertaining
Comment by Panda — July 2, 2009 @ 2:49 am
This article reminds me of the articles I used to write when I was* trying to write like you used to write. Obviously I still look very forward to next week.
Comment by Chats — July 2, 2009 @ 2:54 am
Ahh, that familiar clench of recognition that what’s being talked about refers to ME. I missed it. Good to have you writing again.
Comment by Green Opal — July 2, 2009 @ 5:09 am
lol
Comment by orie — July 2, 2009 @ 5:49 am
best article i have read this year!
Comment by failtego — July 2, 2009 @ 7:00 am
Tim you’re awesome, nice to have you back writing!
Comment by MBW — July 2, 2009 @ 7:32 am
An enjoyable read. Being a guy who feels like he’s on the fringe of the “first PTQ/GP Top 8″, I’d like to see an article on strategy. Constructed or Limited, I feel like there’s some general rules that good players know that I haven’t done incorrectly in front of them to hear them say “you NEVER do X!”, yet.
Comment by Dane Molotok — July 2, 2009 @ 8:38 am
I was going to try to be good at reading this article, but since I’m awful at reading, I punted it.
Comment by Sheldon — July 2, 2009 @ 8:45 am
But you mulled to 5….
Awesome article.
Comment by ra — July 2, 2009 @ 9:08 am
It’s okay, Sheldon. He still had all these. Sick variance, right?
Comment by Lobster411 — July 2, 2009 @ 9:09 am
good article.
expirydates1024 at yahoo dot com might be a better way to write your email though.
Comment by Joki — July 2, 2009 @ 9:41 am
omg chuck klosterman!
Comment by jb — July 2, 2009 @ 10:14 am
he’s baaaack. and LSV is awesome on that absolute scale…i’m pretty stainsy now :D. anyways good to see you writing again.
Comment by Paul Cheon — July 2, 2009 @ 10:28 am
Absolutely fantastic. Exactly the kind of article I want to spend my time reading.
Comment by D3wd3r — July 2, 2009 @ 10:29 am
Glad to see a fellow misanthrope. I also endure a love/hate relationship with humanity. Also, it is refreshing to see people go “against the grain” with their magical musings (no connection specifically to William Spaniel). Often times, while reading pro player articles, I think, “Wow. Good points, but you are saying the same thing everyone else is.”
The herd has to be kept in check, and I appreciate your emphasis on tight technical play. :back-slap:
Comment by dowjonzechemical — July 2, 2009 @ 10:35 am
While I enjoyed the overall point of your article, definetly not a fan of your tone, demeanor, or whatever you would like to call it. I don’t know what I don’t like exactly. The whole article just seemed kind of dickish.
Comment by Ryan — July 2, 2009 @ 11:26 am
Great article Tim (full of some “new to me” observations from your own experiences and a delight to read). Hopefully, financial situations aside, you’ll be writing here on a more regular basis.
Comment by Frank — July 2, 2009 @ 12:16 pm
Pretty darn awesome article. Your straight-forward no excuses type of writing is very interesting, heck even fun to read. Combined with the fact that it was actually useful it makes me look forward to the next one (please let there be a next one!).
I wasn’t really sure about what you meant with the life-totals thing. Do you advice against writing down both players’ life totals? What would you do instead?
Comment by Summa — July 2, 2009 @ 2:23 pm
@Ryan
Its called “satire” Wikipedia it…it will be most enlightening.
@Summa
Re-read the section on life totals. He’s not advising against keeping score, but against recording the reason for every score change. You probably don’t need to write down that he took 6 damage that turn because you pumped your leech in response to a fallout; a simple -6 will suffice.
All things considered, you’re an excellent writer and one that my friends and I have most enjoyed reading. Keep it up and you may well develop a slightly more sophisticated audience. I’m tired of the “donks”. (Yes that was intentional)
Comment by William — July 2, 2009 @ 3:51 pm
BUT I LIKE CARD FLICKING!!!
I hope I don’t give away too many tells with it! =)
Comment by Pacifico — July 2, 2009 @ 4:00 pm
What tim meant about life totals was that some people spend time making notes as to why each life total changed, and that can sap mental resources. You of course should be keeping track of both players’ lives, but not to that degree.
I also enjoyed this article quite a bit
Comment by lsv — July 2, 2009 @ 5:33 pm
I never had the pleasure to read an Aten article but it was definitely worth it. Kudos on the sage advice.
Comment by MckHick — July 2, 2009 @ 7:27 pm
Sick variance!
Comment by Aceman — July 2, 2009 @ 9:32 pm
“I made a comment in a previous article that when my opponent says “Untap. Upkeep. Draw.” every turn, I like my chances of winning.”
Anyone know where I can read said article?
I do it because for the longest time I had this annoying habit of drawing before untapping.
Comment by "..." — July 2, 2009 @ 9:40 pm
I actually had to play Owen Turtenwald once. When I saw the pairings, I thought to myself,” I recognize that name from somewhere”, then my friend quoted his rating. I was on tilt before I sat down.
Its the worst feeling in the world when you always think that they have “the card”. Never sure what it is, but you play around it and then lose to the imaginary card. I learned a lot about my mental game from that match with Turtenwald. (I lost to him 1-2)
Comment by Andy — July 2, 2009 @ 10:01 pm
<3 1024
Comment by Kyle Boddy — July 2, 2009 @ 11:12 pm
While the content is certainly interesting, that tone is unbearable.
I’m really surprised some of you guys are enjoying it.
Comment by Rob — July 2, 2009 @ 11:22 pm
Good to see you writing again. I too am never happy to play against THE OWEN TURTENWALD. Only 13 more hours until the main phase.
-Kyle “nose” best
Comment by The Nose — July 3, 2009 @ 3:03 am
more
Comment by DanB — July 3, 2009 @ 3:07 am
blah…blah…blah… intertwined with pompous, irrelevant banter… blah…
and that’s just the first paragraph
…where I stopped reading
Comment by john — July 3, 2009 @ 3:22 am
@LSV
Thanks…that indeed seems like a stupid thing to be doing.
Here’s to hoping I don’t face such a guy in a faeries mirror!
Comment by Summa — July 3, 2009 @ 3:53 am
@john
Then perhaps you should simply not read the article and instead go find something a bit more up to your level of wit? It is that easy, you know.
Unless you’d rather just complain online like a troll.
Comment by a different Tim — July 3, 2009 @ 4:24 am
Great content, great style.
*thumbs up*
Comment by Daniel — July 5, 2009 @ 11:45 am
If anything is wrong with this article, it is certainly *not* the tone.
Comment by Chats — July 5, 2009 @ 12:17 pm
I am surprised that anyone is bothered by the tone in this article. Mr. Aten’s style comes off as somewhat gruff but very entertaining constructive criticism for all of us. At no point does he suggest that he is immune to these problems, simply that he is aware of them while others might not be. If the tone bothers you, perhaps it is because you are not aware of these issues and not used to criticism.
Comment by Eric Levine — July 5, 2009 @ 4:40 pm
Guilty as charged on about half of these.
Though I never read you before, you can be sure I will again.
Comment by Atemple — July 15, 2009 @ 1:49 pm